ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Result list |  previous  < 179 of 1,049 >  next 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1174 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
doi:10.1016/0308-521X(94)90143-4    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Indiana soybean system model (ISSM): II. Mexican bean beetle model development, integration and evaluation
Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Kumar Nagarajana, R.J. O'Neila, C.R. Edwardsa and J. Lowenberg-DeBoerb

aDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA

bDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA


Received 10 November 1992; 
revised 7 June 1993; 
accepted 18 June 1993. 
Available online 2 October 2003.

Abstract

An age-structured, distributed delay model was used to simulate the population dynamics of Mexican bean beetle (MBB), Epilachna varivestis Mulsant, a sporadic insect pest of soybeans. The MBB model was integrated with a soybean crop model as part of the Indiana soybean system model (ISSM). Results indicated that the model was able to capture the essential aspects of pest dynamics. Life table statistics based on simulation results were close to observed values for laboratory conditions (simulated intrinsic rate of increase, r = 0.056 and observed r = 0.053) and under field conditions (simulated r = 0.011 and observed r = 0.015). Simulated MBB population patterns and peak values were in good agreement with observed data. Differences between simulated and observed population patterns of immature MBB stages were greater than that of adults. Incorporation of mortality due to individual rainstorms and other weather events, and effect of alternate hosts and movement (secondary influx, emigration, etc.) seem to be important for simulating soybean production in a specific field.

The model was used to evaluate the effects of crop variety, planting dates, weather and insect influx patterns on soybean yield. Results from simulation experiments showed that ‘Williams 82’ variety was more susceptible to yield loss (up to 45%) from MBB infestations, than the earlier maturing ‘Century 84’ (up to 25% yield loss). This susceptibility is due to the coincidence of the vulnerable crop stage (pod-setting and seed-filling stages) with the occurrence of the peak populations of MBB stages which cause most of the damage. Late planting tends to mitigate this susceptibility. As the influx patterns determine the extent of yield loss, the timing and magnitude of insect influx should be detected and estimated using timely scouting of fields.


Agricultural Systems
Volume 45, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 291-313
Result list | previous < 179 of 1,049 > next 
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.