ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
My Settings
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Biological Control
Volume 8, Issue 1, January 1997, Pages 43-51
Result list |  previous  < 117 of 166 >  next 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected

Article Toolbox
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
View Record in Scopus
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1997 Published by Elsevier Science (USA).

Regular Article

Estimating Aphidophagous Coccinellid Populations in Alfalfa


This article is not included in your organization's subscription. However, you may be able to access this article under your organization's agreement with Elsevier.

N. C. Elliott and G. J. Michels, Jr. 1

USDA, ARS Plant Science and Water Conservation Research Laboratory, 1301 North Western Street, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 74075

Received 15 February 1996; 
accepted 30 September 1996. ;
Available online 22 April 2002.


Precise yet time-efficient sampling methods for coccinellids would be useful in integrated pest management (IPM) research and decision-making in alfalfa. We compared quadrat sampling, removal sampling, counting coccinellids for a constant amount of time while walking slowly through a field (timed counts), and sweepnet sampling for estimating adult and larval coccinellid density in alfalfa. Removal sampling gave biased estimates of density of adultColeomegilla maculataDegeer, but gave acceptable estimates of density of adults of other species. Regression models were developed to convert relative population estimates of adult and larval coccinellids obtained by sweepnet and timed count sampling to absolute population estimates (number per m2). For adults, plant height was included in the best regression models for converting sweepnet catch and timed counts to population density. For larvae, plant growth stage was included in the best regression model for converting sweepnet catch to density. The number of aphids per 10 sweeps was included in the model for converting timed counts of larvae to density; however, this model was of little value because it explained only 13% of the variation in the relationship between timed counts and population density. Coefficients of determination of regression models for estimating adult density from timed count and sweepnet sampling were 0.90 and 0.93, respectively. The model for converting sweepnet catch of larvae had a coefficient of determination of 0.71. In terms of statistical precision achieved per unit time spent sampling, a 25-sweep sample was the most efficient sample unit for estimating adult density. A double 12-min removal sample was most efficient for sampling larvae, but this method gave biased estimates of larval density, and overall, sweepnet sampling was better.

Author Keywords: Insecta; Coleoptera; Coccinellidae; sampling; sweepnet; alfalfa IPM

1 Current address: Texas A&M Agricultural Experiment Station, P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012.

Biological Control
Volume 8, Issue 1, January 1997, Pages 43-51
Result list | previous < 117 of 166 > next 
My Settings
Help (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.