Об истоках феномена «Кембрийского взрыва» и о происхождении типов животных

Белоусов Л.В. Введение в общую эмбриологию. Изд-во МГУ. 1980. 211 с.

Белоусов Л.В. Рецензия на книгу А.В. Ересковского «Сравнительная эмбриология губок (Porifera)» // Онтогенез. 2006. Т. 37, № 3. С. 193.

Гаузе Г.Ф. Экология и некоторые проблемы происхождения видов. Л.: Наука. 1984.

Городилов Ю.Н. Значение фактора времени в регуляции эмбрионального развития (на примере низших позвоночных) // Онтогенез. 1990. Т. 21, № 3. С. 319–330.

Городилов Ю.Н. Организатор Шпемана: его источники и производные (клеточно-тканевые и молекулярно-генетические аспекты) // Цитология. 2001. Т. 43, № 2. С. 182–203.

Городилов Ю.Н. ГипофПо: новая схема онтогенетического развития // Журн. общей биол. 2003. Т. 64. № 4. C. 318–327.

Городилов Ю.Н. Исследования временных и пространственных характеристик сомитогенеза у зародышей рыб // Онтогенез. 2004. Т.35, № 2. С. 124–139.

Дондуа А.К. Биология развития. В 2 т. Т.1. Начала сравнительной эмбриологии. Изд-во СпбГУ. 2005. 295 с.

Дарвин Ч. Происхождение видов путем естественного отбора. 1991. СПб: Наука. 539 с.

Догель В.А. Зоология беспозвоночных. 1975. М.: Высш. Школа. 560 с.

Ересковский А.В. Сравнительная эмбриология губок (Porifera). СПб: Изд-во СПбГУ. 2005. 304 с.

Иванов А.В. Об эволюции зародышевых листков // Зоол. журн. 1986. Т. 65, вып. 5. С. 652–665.

Иванов А.В., Мамкаев Ю.В. Ресничные черви (Turbellaria). Л., 1973, 221 с.

Иванов П.П. Общая и сравнительная эмбриология. М.–Л. 1937. 810 с.

Иванова-Казас О.М. К вопросу о происхождении и эволюции спирального дробления // Вестник ЛГУ, Сер. биол. 1959. N 9. С. 56–67.

Иванова-Казас О.М. К вопросу о соотношении морфологических осей у Spiralia // Зоол. журн. 1974. Т. 53, вып. 1. С. 5–19.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Сравнительная эмбриология беспозвоночных животных. Простейшие и низшие многоклеточные. Новосибирск, 1975. 372 с.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Сравнительная эмбриология беспозвоночных животных. Трохофорные, щупальцевые, щетинкочелюстные, погонофоры. М.: Наука. 1977. 312 с.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Сравнительная эмбриология беспозвоночных животных. Низшие хордовые. М.: Наука. 1978. 166 с.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Филогенетическое значение спирального дробления // Биология моря. 1982. № 5. С. 3–14.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Происхождение и филогенетическое значение трохофорных личинок. 2. Эволюционное значение личинок целомических червей и моллюсков // Зоол. журн. 1985. Т. 64, вып. 5. С. 650–660.

Иванова-Казас О.М. Эволюционная эмбриология животных. СПб: Наука. 1995. 565 с.

Иванцов А.Ю. Vendia и другие докембрийские «артроподы» // Палеонт. журн. 2001. № 4. С. 3–10.

Иорданский Н.Н. Эволюция жизни. 2001. М., Центр «Академия». 425 с.

Захваткин А.А. Сравнительная эмбриология низших беспозвоночных. М. 1949. 395 с.

Ковалевский А.О. (Kowalevsky A.) Embryologische Studien an Wörmern und Aarthropogen // Mém. Acad. Sci. St.-Petersb. 1871. Ser.7. T. 16. S. 1—70 (перевод см.: Избранные работы, М.–Л., 1951, С. 123–266). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02956047

Корочкин Л.И. Новое в учении о гомеозисных генах // Онтогенез. 1987. Т. 18, № 6. С. 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01342.x

Корочкин Л.И., Евгеньев М.Б. Эволюционизм и «научный» креационизм. М. 2003. 104 с.

Майр Э. Популяции, виды и эволюция. М.: «Мир». 1974. 460 с.

Малахов В.В. Проблема основного плана строения в различных группах вторичноротых животных // Журн. общ. биол. 1977. Т. 38, № 4. С. 485–499.

Малахов В.В. Нематоды. М.:Наука. 1986. 215 с.

Маргелис Л. Роль симбиоза в эволюции клетки. М.: Мир. 1983. 351 с.

Мечников И.И. (Metschnikoff I.I.) Embryologische Studien an Medusen, wien, 1886. 159 S. (перевод см. Акад. собр. соч. М., 1955. Т. 3. С. 172–294).

Северцов А.Н. Морфологические закономерности эволюции. М. 1939.

Серавин Л.Н., Гудков А.В.Образование сложно устроенных организмов в результате контактного агрегативного поведения протистов // Зоол. журн. 2003. T. 82. № 10. C. 1155–1167.

Серавин Л.Н., Гудков А.В. Амебоидные свойства клеток в процессе раннего морфогенеза и природа возможного протозойного предка Metazoa // Журн. общ. биол. 2005. Т.66, № 3. С. 212–223.

Соколов Б.С. О возрасте древнейшего осадочного покрова Русской платформы // Изв. АН СССР. Сер. геол. 1952. № 5. С. 21–31.

Палий В.М. Остатки бесскелетной фауны и следы жизнедеятельности из отложений верхнего докембрия и нижнего кембрия Подолии // Палеонтология и стратиграфия верхнего докембрия и нижнего палеозоя юго-запада Восточно-Европейской платформы. Киев: Наукова. Думка. 1976. С. 63–77.

Рэфф Р., Кофмен Т. Эмбрионы, гены и эволюция. М., 1986. 402 с.

Термье А, Термье Х. Эдиакарская фауна и эволюция животного мира // Палеонтол. журн. 1976. № 3. С. 22–29.

Федонкин М.А. Проморфология вендских Bilateria и проблема происхождения метамерии Articulata // Проблематика позднего докембрия и палеозоя. М.: Наука. 1985. С. 79–92.

Федонкин М.А. Бесскелетная фауна эдиакара и ее место в эволюции метазоа // Тр. Палеонтол.
Ин-та. 1987. Т. 226. М.: Наука. С. 3–175.

Acampora D., Mazan S., Lallemand Y. et al. Forebrain and midbrain regions are deleted in Otx2- / -mutants due to a defective anterior neuroectoderm specification during gastrulation // Development. 1995. Vol. 121. P. 3279–3290.

Adoutte A., Bapavoine G., Lespinet O. et al. The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and implications // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2000. Vol. 97. P. 4453–4456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4453

Arendt D. Comparative aspects of gastrulation. In Gastrulation: from Cells to Embryo. Stern C. (ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 2004. P. 679–693.

Bengtson S., Zhao Y. Predatorial borings in late Precambrian mineralized exoskeletons // Science. 1992. Vol. 257. P. 367–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5068.367

Benito-Guttierez E. A gene catalogue of the amphioxus nerrvous system // Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2006. Vol. 2. P. 149–160. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.2.149

Bottjer D.J., Hagadorn J.W. The Cambrian substrate revolution and evolutionary paleoecology of the Mollusca // Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. 1999. Vol. 31. P. 335.

Bottjer D.J., Hagadorn J.W., Dornbos S.Q. The Cambrian substrate revolution // GSA Today. 2000. Vol. 10, № 9. P. 1–7.

Bowring S.A., Grotzinger J.P., Isachsen C.E. et al. Calibrating rates of early Cambrian evolution // Science. 1993. Vol. 261. P. 1293–98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11539488

Brand M., Heisenberg C.P., Warga R.M. et al. Mutations affecting development of the midline and general body shape during zebrafish embryogenesis // Development. 1996. Vol. 123. P. 129–142.

Brooke N.M., Garsia-Fernandez J., Holland P.W.H. The ParaHox gene clustewr is an evolutionary sister of the Hox cluster // Nature. 1998. Vol. 392. P. 920–922. https://doi.org/10.1038/31933

Budd G.E. The earliest fossil record of the animals and significance // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2008. Vol. 363. P. 1425–1434. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2232

Burke A.C., Nelson C.E., Morgan B.A., Tabin C. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology // Development. 1995. Vol. 121. P. 333–346.

Byrum C.A., Martindale M.Q. Gastrulation in the Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In Gastrulation: from cells to embryo. Stern C. (ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 2004. P. 33–50.

Canfield D.E., Poulton S.W., Narbonne G.M. Late-Neoproterozoic deep-ocean oxygenation and the rise of animal life // Science. 2007. Vol. 315. P. 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1135013

Carroll S.B. Homeotic genes and the evolution of artropods and chordates // Nature. 1995. Vol. 376 P. 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1038/376479a0

Chen J.-Y., Huang D.Y., Li C.W. An early cambrian craniate-like chordate // Nature. 1999. Vol. 402. P. 518–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/990080

Chen J.-Y., Oliveri P., Li C. et al. Precambrian animal diversity: putative phosphatized embryos from the Doushantuo Formation of China // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. Vol. 97. P.4457–4462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4457

Chen J.-Y., Oliveri P., Gao F., Dornbos S.Q., Li C.-W., Bottjer D.J., Davidson E.H. Precambrian animal life: Probable developmental and adult Cnidarian forms from Southwest China // Devel. Biol. 2002. Vol. 248. P. 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0714

Chen J.-Y., Bottjer D.J., Oliveri P. et al. Small bilaterian fossils from 40 to 55 million years before the Cambrian // Science. 2004. Vol. 305. P. 218–222. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099213

Collins A.G., Valentine J.W. Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan bodyplans // Evol. Dev. 2001. Vol. 3, № 6. P.432–442. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142X.2001.01048.x

Colwin A.L., Colwin L.H. Relationship between the egg and larva of Saccoglossus kowalewskyi (Enteropneusta): axes and planes // J. Exp. Zool. 1951. Vol. 117, N 1. P. 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1401170107

Conklin E.G. Mosaic development in ascidian egg // J. Exp. Zool. 1905. Vol. 2, N 2. P. 145–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400020202

Conway Morris S. The crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the rise of animals. 1998. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 268 p.

Conway Morris S. The Cambrian “explosion”: slow-fuse or megatonnage? // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. Vol. 97. P. 4426–4429. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4426

Conway Morris S. The Cambrian “Explosion” of metazoan and molecular biology: would Darwin be satisfied? // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 47. P. 505– 515. https://doi.org/10.1387/19

Conway Morris S. Darwin’s dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian “explosion” // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2006. Vol. 361. P. 1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1846

Corbo J.C., Levine M., Zeller R.W. Characterisation of a notochord-spexific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis // Development. 1997. Vol. 124. P. 589–602.

Couly G.F., Coltey P.M., Le Douarin N.M. The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras // Development. 1992. Vol. 114. P. 1–15.

Couly G.F., Coltey P.M., LeDouarin N.M. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras // Development. 1993. Vol. 117. P. 409–429.

Couly G., Grapin-Botton A., Coltey P., Ruhin B., Le Douarin N.M. Determination of the identity of the derivatives of the cephalic neural crest: incompatibility between Hox gene expression and lower jaw development // Development. 1998. Vol. 125. P. 3445–3459.

Davidson E.H. Precambrian animal diversity: Putative phosphatized embryos from the Doushantuo Formafion of China // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. Vol. 97. P. 4457–4462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4457

Davidson E.H. Genomic regulatory systems. Development and evolution. 2001. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 261 p.

Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a Universe without Design. New York: W.W. Norton. 1986. 358 p.

De Robertis E.M. Spemann’s organizer and selfregulation in amphibian embryos // Nature Reviews. Molec. Cell Biol. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1855

De Robertis E.M. Evo-Devo: variations on ancestral themes // Cell. 2008. Vol. 132. P. 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.003

De Robertis E.M., Sasai Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria // Nature. 1996. Vol. 380. P. 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/380037a0

Droser M.L., Gehling J.G., Jensen S. When the worm turned: concnrdance of Early Cambrian ichnofabric and trace-fossil record in siliciclastic rocks of South Australia // Geology. 1999. Vol. 27. P. 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0625:WTWTCO>2.3.CO;2

Duboule D. Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: a basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony // Development. 1994. Supplement. P. 135–142.

Duboule D., Dolle P. The structural and functional organization of the murine Hox gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes // EMBO J. 1989. Vol. 8. P. 1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03534.x

Erwin D.H., Davidson E.H. The last common bilaterian ancestor // Development. 2002. Vol. 129. P. 3021–3032.

Erwin D.H., Valentine J.W., Sepkowski J.J. A comparative study of diversification events: The early Paleozoic versus the Mesozoic // Evolution. 1987. Vol. 41. P. 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409086

Fedonkin M.A., Waggoner B.M. The late precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism // Nature. 1997. Vol. 388. P. 868–872. https://doi.org/10.1038/42242

Ferguson E.L. Conservation of dorsal–ventral patterning in artropods and chordates // Curr.Opin. Genet. Dev. 1996. Vol. 6. P. 424–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80063-3

Ferrier D.E.K., Minguillon C., Holland P.W.H., Garsia-Fernandez J. The amphioxus Hox cluster: Deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14 // Evol. Dev. 2000. Vol. 2. P. 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00070.x

Ferrier D.E.K., Holland P.W.H Ciona intestinalis ParaHox genes: evolution of Hox/ParaHox cluster integrity, developmental mode and temporal colinearity // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2002. Vol. 24. P. 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00204-X

Ferrier D.E.K., Minguillon C. Evolution of the Hox/Parahox gene clusters // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 47. P. 605–611.

Finnerty J.R. The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa: how old is bilaterial symmetry? // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 47, N 7–8. P. 523–529.

Finnerty J.R., Pang K., Burton P. et al. Origins of Bilateral symmetry: Hox and Dpp expression in a sea anemone // Science. 2004. Vol. 304. P. 1335–1337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091946

Fried C., Prohaska S.J., Stadler P.F. Exclusion of repetitive DNA elements from gnathostome Hox clusters // J. Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 2004. Vol. 302B. P. 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.20007

Gans C., Northcutt R.G. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head // Science 1983. Vol. 220. P. 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4594.268

Gaunt S.J. Conservation in the Hox code during morphological evolution // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1994. Vol. 38. P. 549–552.

Gehling J.G. Algal binding of siliciclastic sediments: A mechanism in the preservation of Ediacaran fossils // 12th International Sedimentological Congress, Canberra, Australia. Abstracts. 1986. P. 117.

Gehling J.G. Microbial mats in terminal Proterozoic siliciclastics: Ediacaran death masks // Palaios. 1999. Vol. 14. P. 40–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515360

Gehring W.J. The discovery of the homeobox in retrospective // Taniguchi Symposium on Developmental Biology IX. 1997. Kyoto, Japan, P. 45–50.

Gehring W.J. The genetic control of eye development and its implications for the evolution of the various eye- types // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2002. Vol. 46. P. 65–73.

Gehring W.J. Historical persrective on the development and evolution of eyes photoreceptors // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.041900wg

Gilbert S. Developmental Biology, 3d ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc., 1991. 831p.

Gilbert S.F. Continuity and change: paradigm shifts in neural inguction // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2001. V. 45. P. 155–164.

Glaessner M.F. The oldest fossil faunas of South Australia // Geol. Rdsch. 1958. Bd. 47. S. 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800671

Glaessner M.F. The dawn of animal life. A biohistorical study. Cambridge: Univ. Press. 1984. 224 p.

Glaessner M.F., Wade M. The late Precambrian fossil from Ediacara, South Australia // Palaeontology. 1966. Vol. 9. P. 599–628.

Goldschmidt R. The material basis of evolution. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press. 1940. 436 p.

Gorodilov Y.N. Rhythmic processes in lower vertebrate embryogenesis and their role for developmental control // Zool. Sci. 1992. Vol. 9. P. 1101–1111.

Gorodilov Y.N. The fate of Spemann’s organizer // Zool. Sci. 2000. Vol. 17. P. 1197–1220. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.1197

Gould S.J. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W.W. Norton. 1989. 347 p.

Gould S.J. Of Tongue Worms, Velvet Worms, and Water Bears // Natural History 1995. Vol. 104. P. 15

Greuet C. Structure fine d’ocelle d’Erythropsis pavillardi Hertwig, pteridinien warnowiidae Lindemann // C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris). 1965. Vol. 261. P. 1904–1907.

Grotsinger J.P., Bowring S.A., Saylor B.Z., Kaufman A.J. Biostratigraphic and geochronological constraints on early animal evolution // Science. 1995. Vol. 270. P. 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5236.598

Gruner H.-E. Einführung in Lehrbuch der speziellen Zoologie. Jena, 1980. Bd. 1. S. 15–156.

Haeckel E. Die Gastrula und die Eifurchung der Thiere (Fortsetsung der “Gastraea Theorie”) // Jen. Ztsch. Naturwiss. 1875. Bd. 9. S. 402–508.

Hagadorn J.W., Bottjer D.J. Wrinkle structures: Microbially mediated sedimentary structures common in subtidal siliciclastic settings at the Proterozoic– Phanerozoic transition // Geology. 1997. Vol. 25. P. 1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<1047:WSMMSS>2.3.CO;2

Hagadorn J.W., Bottjer D.J. Restriction of a late Neoproterozoic biotope: Suspect-microbial structures and trace fossils at the Vendian–Cambrian transition // Palaios. 1999. Vol. 14. P. 73–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515362

Hall B.K., S. Hörstadius. The neural crest. 1988. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 302 p.

Hatschek B. Studien uber Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden // Arb. Zool. Inst. Wien. 1878. Bd. 1. S. 277–404.

Herrmann B.G., Labeit S., Poutska A., King T.R., Lehrach H. Cloning of the T gene required in mesoderm formation in the mouse // Nature. 1990. Vol. 343. P. 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/343617a0

Hoffman P.F., Kaufman A.J., Halverson G.P. Comings and goings of global glaciation on a Neoproterozoic tropical platform in Namibia // GSA Today. 1998. Vol. 8, N 5. P. 1–9.

Hoffman P.F., Kaufman A.J., Halverson G.P., Schrag D.F. A Neoproterozoic snowball Earth // Science 1998. Vol. 281. P. 1342–1346. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5381.1342

Hoffman P.F., Schrag D.F. The snowball Earth hypothesis: testing the limits of global change // Terra Nova. 2002. Vol. 14. P. 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3121.2002.00408.x

Holland H.D. Early Proterozoic atmospheric change. In: Early life on earth. (ed. S.Bengtson). Nobel Simposium. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. 1994. Vol. 84. P. 237–244.

Holland H.D. The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2006. Vol. 361. P. 903–915. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1838

Holland L.Z. Non-neural ectoderm is really neural: evolution of developmental patterning mechanisms in the non-neural ectoderm of chordates and the problem of sensory cell homologies // J. Exp. Zool. B. Mol. Dev. Evol. 2005. Vol. 304. P. 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21038

Holley S.A., Jackson P.D., Sasai Y. et al. A conserved system for dorsal–ventral patterning in insects and vertebrates involving sog and chordin // Nature. 1995. Vol. 376. P. 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/376249a0

Hotta K., Takahashi H., Erives A., Levine M., Satoh N. Temporal expression patterns of 39 Brachyury – downstream genes associated with notochord formation in the Ciona intestinalis embryo // Develop. Growth Differ. 1999. Vol. 41. P. 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169x.1999.00467.x

Hyde W.T., Crowley T.J., Baum S.K., Peltier W.R. Neoproterozoic “snowball Earth”: Stimulations with a coupled climate/ice-sheet model // Nature. 2000. Vol. 405. P. 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/35013005

Hyman L.H. Invertebrates. New York etc. 1951. Vol.II. Platyhelminthes and Rynchocoela, the acoelomata Bilateria. 550 p.

Jaegersten G. On the early phylogeny of the Metazoa // Zool. Bidr. Uppsala. 1955. Vol.30. P. 321–354.

Jollie M. The origin of the vertebrate brain // Annals of New York Academy of Sciences. 1977. Vol. 299. P. 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb41900.x

Kah L.C., Bartley J.K. eds. 2001. Rodinia and the Mesoproterozoic Earth-ocean system. Precambrian Res. V. 111: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00153-X

Kasting J.F., Pavlov A.A., Siefert J.I. A coupled ecosystem–climate model for predicting the methane concentration in the Archean atmosphere // Orig. Life Evol. Biosphere. 2001. Vol. 31. P. 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010600401718

Kerr R. Evolution’s Big Ban gets even more explosive. Science. 1993. Vol. 261. P. 1274–75. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.261.5126.1274

Kimmel C.B., Miller C.T., Moens C.B. Specification and morphogenesis of the zebrafish larval head skeleton // Dev. Biol. 2001. Vol. 233. P. 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0201

Knoll A. Life on a young Planet. 2003. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press. 275p.

Knoll A.H., Xiao S.H. On the age of the Doushantuo Formation // Acta Micropalaeontol. Sinica. 1999. Vol. 16. P. 225–236.

Knoetgen H., Viebahn G., Kessel M. Head induction in the chick by primitive endoderm of mammalian, but not avian origin // Development. 1999. Vol. 126. P. 815–825.

Kontges G., Lumsden A. Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny // Development 1996. Vol. 122. P. 3229–3242.

Kuratani S., Horigome N., Hirano S. Developmental morphology of the cephalic mesoderm and re-evolution of segmental theories of the vertebrate head: evidence from embryos of an agnathan vertebrate, Lampetra japonica // Dev. Biol. 1999. Vol. 210. P. 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9266

Laufer E., Dahn R., Orozco O.E., Yeo C.Y. et al. Expression of Radical fringe in limb-bud ectoderm regulates apical ectodermal ridge formation // Nature. 1997. Vol. 386. P. 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/386366a0

Laurence A., Struhl G. Morphogens, compartments and pattern: lessons from Drosophila? // Cell. 1996. Vol. 85. P. 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81297-0

Le Douarin N.M. The neural crest. 1999. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897948

Le Douarin N.M., Creuset S., Couly G., Dupin E. Neural crest cell plasticity and its limits // Development. 2004. Vol. 131. P. 4637–4650. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01350

Li C., Chen J., Hua T. Precambrian sponges with cellular structure // Science. 1998. Vol. 279. P. 879–882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5352.879

Lewis E.B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila // Nature. 1978. Vol. 276. P. 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1038/276565a0

Lewis E.B. Clusters of master control genes regulate the development of higher organisms // J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1992. Vol. 267. P. 1524–1531. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.11.1524

Lewis E.B. The bithorax complex: the first fifty years // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 1998. Vol. 42. P. 403–415.

MacArthur R.H. Population ecology of some warblers of north-eastern coniferous forests // Ecology. 1958. Vol. 39. P. 599–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931600

Margulis L. Symbiosis in cell evolution: Life and its environment on the early earth. San Francisco, 1981.

Margulis L. Archaeal – eubacterial mergers in the origin of Eukaria; philogenetic classification of life // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 1996. Vol. 93. P. 1071–1076. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.3.1071

Martin M.W., Grazhdankin D.V., Bowring S.A. et al. Age of Neoproterozoic bilaterian body and trace fossils, White Sea, Russia: Implications for metazoan evolution // Science. 2000. Vol. 288. P. 841–845. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5467.841

Martindale M.Q., Pang K., Finnerty J. R. Investigayion the origins of triploblasty: “mesodermal” gene expression in a diploblastic animal, the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis (phylum, Cnidaria; class, Anthozoa) // Development. 2004. Vol. 131. P. 2463–2474. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01119

Mattick J.S. A new paradigm for developmental biology // J. Exp. Biol. 2007. Vol. 210. P. 1526–1547. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.005017

McDonald J.F. The molecular basis of adaptation: a critical review of relevant ideas and observations // Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 1983. Vol.14. P. 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.000453

McGinnis W., Levine M.S., Hafen E. et al. A conserved DNA sequence in homeotic genes of the Drosophila Antennapedia and Bithorax complexes. Nature. 1984. Vol. 308. P. 428–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/308428a0

Mergner H. Die Ei- und Embryonalentwicklung von Eudendrium racemosum // Zool. Jb., Anat.1957. Bd. 76, H. 1. S. 64–164.

Minguillon C., Gardnyes J., Serra E. et al. No more than 14: the end of the amphioxus Hox cluster // Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2005. Vol. 1. P. 19–23. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.1.19

Moghadam H.K., Ferguson M.M., Danzmann R.G. Evidence for Hox gene duplication in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): a tetraploid model species // J. Mol. Evol. 2005. Vol. 61. p. 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-004-0230-5

Monteiro A.S., Ferrier D.E.K. Hox genes are not always colinear // Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2006. Vol. 2. P. 95–103. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.2.95

Nakauchi M., Takeshita T. Ascidian one half embryos can develop into functional adult ascidians // J. Exp. Zool. 1983. Vol. 227. P. 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402270120

Narbonne G.M. The Ediacara biota: Neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems // Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2005. Vol. 33. P. 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122519

Nielsen C. Larval ciliary bands and metazoan phylogeny // Fortschr. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsf. 1979. Beih. 1. S. 178–184.

Nielsen C. Animal phylogeny in the light of the trochaea theory // Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1985. Vol. 25. P. 243–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1985.tb00396.x

Nielsen C. Animal evolution: interrelationships of living phyla, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. 402 p.

Nielsen C. Trochophoral larvae: cell-lineages, ciliary bands, and body regions. 1. Annelida and Mollusca // J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.). 2004. Vol. 302B. P. 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.20001

Nielsen C. Trochophoral larvae: cell-lineages, ciliary bands, and body regions. 2. Other grous and general discussion // J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.). 2005. Vol. 304B. P. 401–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21050

Noden D.M., Trainor P.A. Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations // J. Anat. 2005. Vol. 207. P. 575–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00473.x

Northcutt R.G., Gans C. The genesis of neural crest and epidermal placods: a reinterpretation of vertebrate origins // Quart. Rev. Biol. 1983. Vol.58. P. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/413055

Nǖslein-Volhard C., Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila // Nature. 1980. Vol. 287. P. 795–801. https://doi.org/10.1038/287795a0

Osborne P.W., Luke G.N., Holland P.W., Ferrier D.E. Identification and characterisation of five novel miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in amphioxus Branchiostoma floridae // Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2006. Vol. 2, N 2. P. 54–60. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.2.54

Quiring R., Walldorf U., Kloter U., Gehring W.J. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in Humans // Science. 1994. Vol. 265. P. 785–789. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7914031

Retallack G.J. Were the Ediacaran fossils lichens? // Paleobiology. 1994. Vol. 20. P. 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300012975

Salvini-Plawen L. Phylogenetischer status und Bedeutung der mesenchymaten Bilateria // Zool. Jb., Anat. 1980. Bd. 103, H. 2/3. S. 354–373.

Salvini-Plawen L., Mayr E. On the evolution of photoreceptors and eyes // Evol. Biol. 1977. Vol. 10. P. 207–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6953-4_4

Salvini-Plawen L., Splechtna H. Zur Homologie der Keimblätter // Ztschr. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsf. 1979. Bd. 17. H. 2. S. 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.1979.tb00687.x

Sander K. The evolution of patterning mechanisms: gleanings from insect embryogenesis and spermatogenesis. In Development and Evolution (eds Goodwin B.C., Holder N. & Wylie C.C.). Cambridge University Press. 1983. P. 137–159.

Schindelwolf O.H. Basic questions in Paleontology: Geologic Time, Organic Evolution, and Biological Systematics. University Chicago Press. 1993. 494 p.

Scott M., Weiner A., Haselrigg V. et al. The molecular organization of the Antennapedia locus of Drosophila // Cell 1983. Vol. 35. P. 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(83)90109-5

Seifert R., Jacob M., Jacob H.J. The avian prechordal head region: a morphological study // J.Anat. 1993. Vol. 183. P. 75–89.

Seidel F. Korpergrundgestalt und Keimstruktur // Zool. Anz. 1960. Bd. 164. H. 7–10. S. 245–305.

Seidel F. Einleitung zum Gesamtwerk morphogenetische Arbeitsmethoden und Begriffssysteme // Morphogenese der Tiere/ Ed. F. Seidel. 1978. Lf. 1. S. 11–67.

Seilacher A. Late Precambrian and Early Cambrian Metazoa: preservational or real extinctions? // Patterns of change in Earth evolution / Ed. H.D. Holland, A.F. Trendall. Berlin etc.: Springer, 1984. P. 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69317-5_10

Seilacher A. Vendozoa: organistic construction in the Proterozoic biosphere // Lethaia. 1989. Vol.22. P. 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1989.tb01332.x

Seilacher A. Vendobionta and Psammocorallia: lost constructions of PreCambrian evolution // J. Geol. Soc. London. 1992. Vol. 149. P. 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0607

Seilacher A. Biomat-related lifestyles in the Precambrian // Palaios. 1999. Vol. 14. P. 86–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515363

Seipel K, Schmid V. Evolution of striated muscle: jellyfish and the origin of triploblasty // Dev. Biol. 2005. Vol. 282. P. 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.03.032

Seipel K, Schmid V. Mesodermal anatomies in cnidarian polyps and medusae // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2006. Vol. 50. P. 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.062150ks

Shankland M., Seaver E.C. Evolution of the bilaterian body plan: what have we learned from the annelids // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. Vol.97. P. 4434–4437. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4434

Shawlot W., Behringer R.R. Requirement for Lim1 in head-organizer function // Nature. 1995. Vol. 374. P. 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/374425a0

Shimeld S.M. The evolution of the hedhehog gene family in chordates: insights from amphioxus hedgehog // Dev. Genes Evol. 1999. Vol. 209. P. 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004270050225

Shu D-G., Luo H-L., Conway Morris S. et al. Lower cambrian vertebrates from South China // Nature. 1999. Vol. 402. P. 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/46965

Shu D-G., Chen L., Han J, Znang X-L. An early cambrian tunicate from China // Nature. 2001. Vol. 411. P. 472–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/35078069

Shu D-G., Conway Morris S., Han J. et al. Head and backbone of the early cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys // Nature. 2003. Vol. 421. P. 526–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01264

Siewing R. Lehrbuch der verleichenden Entwicklungsgeschichte der Tiere. Hamburg, 1969. 333 s.

Signor P. W. III. Real and Apparent Trends in Species Richness Through Time. In J. W. Valentine, ed., Phanerozoic Diversity Patterns: Profiles in Macroevolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1985. P. 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400855056.129

Simpson A.G.B., Bernard C., Fenchel T., Patterson D.J. The organisation of Mastigamoeba schizophrenia n. sp.: more evidence of ultrastructural idiosyncras and simplicity in pelobiont protists // Eur. J. Protistol. 1997. Vol. 33. P. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0932-4739(97)80024-7

Slack J.M.W., Holland P.W.H., Graham C.F. The zootype and the phylotipic stage // Nature. 1993. Vol. 361. P. 490–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/361490a0

Sprigg R.C. Early Cambrian (?) jellyfishes from the Flinders ranges, South Australia // Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 1947. Vol. 71, Pt. 2. P. 212–24.

Sprigg R.C. Early Cambrian “jellyfishes” of Ediacara, South Australia and Mount John, Kimberley District,Western Australia // Trans. R. Soc. S. Austr. 1949. Vol. 73, Pt. 1. P. 72–99.

Spring J., Yanze N., Middel A.M. et al. The mesoderm specification factor twist in the life cycle of jellyfish // Dev. Biol. 2000. Vol. 228. P. 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2000.9956

Spring J., Yanze N., Josch et al. Conservation of Brachyury, Mef2, and Snail in the myogenic lineage of jellyfish: a connection tj the mesoderm of bilateria // Dev. Biol. 2002. Vol. 244. P. 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0616

Steiner M., Reitner J. Evidence of organic structures in Ediacara-type fossils and associated microbial mats// Geology. 2001. Vol. 29, N. 12. P. 1119–1122. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<1119:EOOSIE>2.0.CO;2

Takatori N., Satou Y., Satoh N. Expression of hedgehog genes in Ciona intestinalis embryos // Mech. of Development. 2002. V. 116. P. 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00150-8

Taft R. J., Pheasant M., Mattick J. S. The relationship between non-protein-coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity// BioEssays. 2007. Vol. 29. P. 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20544

Technau U. Brachyuri, the blastopore and the evolution of the mesoderm // BioEssays. 2001. Vol. 23. P. 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.1114

Technau U., Scholz C. Origin and evolution of endoderm and mesoderm // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 47. P. 531–539.

Thomson K.S. Macroevolution: The morphological problem // Amer. Zool. 1992. Vol. 32. P. 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/32.1.106

Valentine J.W. Prelude to the Cambrian explosion // Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2002. Vol. 30. P. 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.30.082901.092917

Valentine J.W., Erwin D.H. Interpreting great developmental experiments: the fossil record. Development as an Evolutionary Process, ed. Raff R.A., Raff E.C. (New York: Alan R. Liss). 1987. P. 71–107.

Valentine J.W., Jablonski D., Erwin D.H. Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion // Development. 1999. Vol. 126. P. 851–859.

Valentine J.W., Jablonski D. Morphological and developmental macroevolution: a paleontological perspective // Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 47. P. 517–522.

Van Auken K., Weaver D.C., Edgar L.C., Wood W.B. Caenorhabditis elegans embryonic axial patterning requires two recently discovered posterior-group Hox genes // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000. Vol. 97. P. 4499–4503. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4499

Van Beneden E. Recherches sur la développement des Arachnactis // Arch. Biol. 1891. T. 11, f. 4. P. 115–146.

Werner B. Life cycles of the Cnidaria // Developmental and cellular biology of coelenterates // Eds. P. Tardent, R. Tardent. Amsterdam; New York, 1980. P. 3–10.

Wilkinson D.G. Molecular mechanisms of segmental patterning in the vertebrate hindbrain and neural crest. BioEssays. 1993. Vol. 15. P. 499–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.950150802

Willmer P. Invertebrate relationships: pattern in animal evolution. 1994. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 397 p.

Wolpert L. Gastrulation and the evolution of development // Dev Suppl. 1992. P. 7–13.

Xiao S., Zhang Y., Knoll A.H. Algae and embryos in a Neoproterozoic phosphorite // Nature. 1998. Vol. 391. P. 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/35318

Xiao S., Knoll A.H. Phosphatized animal embryos from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation at Weng’an, Guizhou, South China // J. Paleontol. 2000a. Vol. 74. P. 767–788. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002233600003300X

Xiao S., Yuan X., Knoll A.H. Eumetazoan fossils in terminal Proterozoic phosphorites? // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000b. Vol. 97. P. 13684–13689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.250491697