Место зоологической номенклатуры в эпоху развития информационных технологий

Н.Г. Богуцкая

Труды Зоологического института РАН, 2013, 317(Приложение 2):

Резюме

В статье рассмотрена специфика современного периода развития таксономической зоологии в связи с развитием информационных технологий в целом и представления информации онлайн, в частности. Рассмотрены основные положения Поправки к действующему Кодексу зоологической номенклатуры, основное содержание которой составляют: 1. включение электронных публикаций некоторых определённых категорий в список пригодных в смысле придания статуса пригодности опубликованным в них названиям и номенклатурным актам; 2. регистрация названий и номенклатурных актов. Обсуждаются причины и основания для принятых изменений Кодекса.

Ключевые слова

зоологическая информация в World Wide Web, Кодекс зоологической номенклатуры, регистрация, электронные публикации, ZooBank

Опубликована 16 сентября 2013 г.

Литература

Agassiz L. 1848. Nomenclatoris zoologici. Index universalis nomima systematica classium, ordinum, familiarum et generum animalium omnium tam viventium quam fossilium. Sumtibus et typus Jent et Gassman, Soloduri, 1135 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1819

Allcock L. and Polaszek A. 2010. Contributions to the Discussion on Electronic Publication VI. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 67(4): 278.

Anonymous. 2001. The future of the electronic scientific literature. Nature, 413: 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/35092665

Blanchard R., Maehrenthal F. von and Stiles C.W. 1905. Règles internationales de la nomenclature zoologique adoptées par les Congrès International de Zoologie. International Rules of Zoological Nomenclature. Internationale Regeln der Zoologischen Nomenklatur. Rudeval, Paris.

Butler D. 2006. Mashups mix data into global service. Nature, 439: 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/439006a

Erwin T.L. 1983. Tropical forest canopies: the last biotic frontier. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 29: 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/besa/29.1.14

Godfray H.C.J. 2002. Towards taxonomy’s “glorious revolution”. Nature, 420: 461. https://doi.org/10.1038/420461a

Hey T. et al. (Eds) 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, Microsoft Research (http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/collaboration/fourthparadigm/)

Hine C. 2008. Systematics as cyberscience: Computers, change, and continuity in science. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 112 p. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262083713.001.0001

Howe D., Costanzo M., Fey P., Gojobori T., Hannick L., Hide W., Hill D.P., Kania R., Schaeffer M., St. Pierre S., Twigger S., White O. and Rhee S.Y. 2008. The future of biocuration. Nature, 455: 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/455047a

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1961. International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of Zoology. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xviii+176 p.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1964. International code of zoological nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of Zoology. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xx+176 p.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1985. International code of zoological nomenclature. Third Edition.Adopted by the XX General Assembly of the International Union of Biological Sciences. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature in Association with British Museum (Natural History), London, and University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, xx+338 p.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences, 4th edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 p.

Kelling S. 2009. Data-intensive science: a new paradigm for biodiversity studies. BioScience, 59: 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12

Kelly K. 2008. Technological twist on taxonomy. Nature, 452: 939. https://doi.org/10.1038/452939a

Knapp S., McNeill and Turland N.J. 2011. Changes to publication requirements made at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne – what does e-publication mean for you? PhytoKeys, 6: 5–11. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.6.1960

Knapp S. and Wright D. 2010. E-publish or perish? In: A. Polaszek (Ed). Systema Naturae 250 – the Linnaean Ark. Taylor and Francis, London: 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1420095012-c8

Knapp S., Polaszek A. and Watson M. 2007. Spreading the word. Nature, 446: 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/446261a

Linnaeus C. 1753. Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas ad genera relatas. Tomus I, II. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae [Stockholm], i–i+ 1–824+673 p.

Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Tomus 1. Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae [Stockholm], 824 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542

Lipscomb D., Platnick N. and Wheeler Q. 2003. The intellectual content of taxonomy: a comment on DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00060-5

Mallet J. 2000. Species and their names. (Review of “Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays,” edited by R.A. Wilson). Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 344–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01879-6

Mallet J. and Willmott K. 2003. Taxonomy: renaissance or Tower of Babel? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00061-7

Marschall A. de (Ed.) 1873. Nomenclator zoologicus ... R. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Vindobonae [=Wien], vi+482 pp.

May R.M. 1988. How many species are there on earth? Science, 241: 441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.241.4872.1441

McNeill J. 2006. XVII International Botanical Congress: Summary report of the actions of the nomenclatural section of the Congress – Vienna, Austria 12–16 July, 2005. Botanical Electronic News, 356. Available from https://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/ben356.html (accessed 29 September 2011).

McNeill J., Turland N.J., Monro A. and Lepschi B.J. 2011. XVIII International Botanical Congress: preliminary mail vote and report of Congress action on nomenclature proposals. Taxon, 60: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.605034

Minelli A. 1999. The names of animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 462–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01747-4

Minelli A. 2003. The status of taxonomic literature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00051-4

National Research Council of the National Academies. 2009. A new biology for the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 102 p.

Neave S.A. 1939–1940. Nomenclator Zoologicus. A list of the names of genera and subgenera in Zoology from the Tenth Edition of Linnaeus 1758 to the end of 1935. The Zoological Society of London, London. [1939 A–C. Vol. 1, xiv+957 p.; 1939 D–L. Vol. 2, 1025 p.; 1940 M–P. Vol. 3, 1065 p.; 1940 Q – Z and supplement. Vol. 4, 758 p.]. https://doi.org/10.2307/1439031

Neave S.A. 1950. [Supplement.] 1936–1945. The Zoological Society of London. London. Vol. 5, [viii]+308 p.

Neave S.A. 1966. [Supplement.] 1946–1955. The Zoological Society of London. London. Vol. 6, [xii]+329 p.

Neave S.A. 1975. [Supplement.] 1956–1965. The Zoological Society of London. London. Vol. 7, [vi]+374 p.

Neave S.A. 1993. [Supplement.] 1966–1977. The Zoological Society of London. London. Vol. 8, [vi]+620 p.

Patterson D.J., Cooper J., Kirk P.M., Pyle R.L. and Remsen D.P. 2010. Names are key to the big new biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 25: 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.004

Penev L., Roberts D., Smith V., Agosti D. and Erwin T. 2010. Taxonomy shifts up a gear: New publishing tools to accelerate biodiversity research. ZooKeys, 50: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.543

Polaszek A. (Ed.) 2010. Systema Naturae 250 – The Linnaean Ark. CRC Press, Boca Raton, xvi+276 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1420095012

Polaszek A., Agosti D., Alonso-Zarazaga M. et al. 2005a. A universal register for animal names. Nature, 437: 477. https://doi.org/10.1038/437477a

Polaszek A., Alonso-Zarazaga M., Bouchet P., Brothers D.J., Evenhuis N., Krell F.-Th., Lyal C.H.C., Minelli A., Pyle R.L., Robinson N.J., Thompson F.C. and van Tol J. 2005b. ZooBank: the open-access register for zoological taxonomy: Technical Discussion Paper. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 62: 210–220. http://www.iczn.org/ZooBank_Paper.htm

Polaszek A., Pyle R. and Yanega D. 2008. Animal names for all: ICZN, ZooBank, and the New Taxonomy. In: Q.D. Wheeler (Ed.) The New Taxonomy. CRC Press, Boca Raton: 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420008562.ch8

Pyle R. and Michel E. 2008. Zoobank: Developing a nomenclatural tool for unifying 250 years of biological information. Zootaxa, 1950: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1950.1.6

Pyle R. and Michel E. 2009. Unifying nomenclature: ZooBank and Global Names Usage Bank. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 66: 298.

Ride W.D.L. 1999. Introduction. In: International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London: xix–xxix.

Rookmaaker L.C. 2011. The early endeavours by Hugh Edwin Strickland to establish a code for zoological nomenclature in 1842–1843. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 68(1): 29–40.

Saarenmaa H. 2002. Technological opportunities and challenges in building a global biological information infrastructure. In: H. Saarenmaa and E.H. Nielsen (Eds) Towards a biological information infrastructure. European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen: 60–72.

Schulze F.E., Kükenthal W.G., Heider K., Kuhlgatz Th. and Hesse R. 1926–1954. Nomenclator Animalium Generum et Subgenerum. 1. Bd. A–B, nebst Einleitung und Litteraturverzeichnis. 2. Bd. C–F. 3. Bd. F–M. 4. Bd. N–P. 5. Bd. Q–Z. Preussiche Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, ccxliv+3717 p.

Scudder S.H. 1882–1884. Nomenclator Zoologicus, an alphabetical list of all generic names that have been employed by naturalists for recent and fossil animals from the earliest times to the close of the year 1879. Bulletin of the U. S. Nattional Museum, 19: xxi+376, i+340 p. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.03629236.19.i

Seberg O., Humphries C.J., Knapp S., Stevenson D.W., Petersen G., Scharff N. and Andersen N.M. 2003. Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 63–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00059-9

Sherborn C.D. 1902. Index Animalium sive index nominum quae ab A. D. MDCCLVIII generibus et speciebus animalium imposita sunt. Sectio Prima. A Kalendis Ianuariis, MDCCLVIII usque ad finem Decembris, MDCCC. Cantabridgiae [=Cambridge, England], lix+1195 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.159249

Sherborn C.D. 1922. Sectio Secunda. A kalendis Ianuariis, MDCCCI usque ad finem Decembris, MDCCCL. British Museum, London, cxxxi+7056 pp.

Sherborn C.D. 1932. Sectio Secunda. A kalendis Ianuariis, MDCCCI usque ad finem Decembris, MDCCCL. Epilogue, additions to Bibliography, additions and corrections, and index to trivialia. British Museum, London, cxlviii+1098 p.

Stork N.E. 1997. Measuring global biodiversity and its decline. In: M.L. Reaka-Kudlaet al. (Eds.) Biodiversity II. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C.: 41–68.

Strickl and H.E. 1878. Rules for Zoological Nomenclature. John Murray, London, 27 p.

Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H. and Vogler A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00041-1

Taylor M.P. 2009. Electronic publication of nomenclatural acts is inevitable, and will be accepted by the taxonomic community with or without the endorsement of the Code. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 66(3): 205–214.

Waterhouse C.O. and Sharp D. 1902. Index Zoologicus, an alphabetical list of names of genera and subgenera proposed for use in zoology as recorded in the “Zoological Record” 1880–1900, together with other names not included in the “Nomenclator Zoologicus” of S.H. Scudder. London, xii+421 p.

Waterhouse C.O. and Sharp D. 1912. Index Zoologicus, an alphabetical list of names of genera and subgenera proposed for use in zoology as recorded in the “Zoological Record” 1880–1900, together with other names not included in the “Nomenclator Zoologicus” of S. H. Scudder. No. 2. London, vi+324 p.

Welter-Schultes F., Eikel O., Feuerstein V. et al. 2009. Comment on the proposed Amendment of Articles of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 66(3): 215–219.

Wheeler Q.D. (Ed.) 2008. The New Taxonomy. CRC Press, New York, xi+237 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420008562

Wheeler Q.D. and Krell F.T. 2007. Codes must be updated so that names are known to all. Nature, 447: 142. https://doi.org/10.1038/447142c

Wilson E.O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, 424 p.

Wilson E.O. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)00040-X

Zander R.Н. 2004. Report of the Special Committee on Electronic Publishing with two proposals to amend the Code. Taxon, 53: 592–594. https://doi.org/10.2307/4135652

Zhang Zh.-Q. 2008. Opening the door to electronic publication of zoological nomenclature and taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1908: 68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1908.1.6